On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 01:25:54 +0200 Mikkel Bang wrote: > Den 23:44 8. april 2012 skrev RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> > følgende: > > > > > The FreeBSD site isn't great, but this site is worse. > > > > Has no-one ever pointed-out the irony that the top 20% of the page > > bangs-on about simplifying, and has a "fight bloat on your website" > > link, but the other 80% is a cluttered mess. > > > > It also has a pet hate of mine: menus that make the rest of the page > > move around even when the pointer is just passing-over them. I can > > forgive the FreeBSD site all its faults for not doing that. > > > > I understand you're trying to stand up for FreeBSD,
You understand wrongly. I don't really care about the FreeBSD site. I genuinely think that Siegel+Gale have a substandard website. Take a look at the Royal Academy and Design Council sites he linked - it's not in the same league. > but what you're > saying makes little sense. Siegel+Gale is one of the world's most > respected design agencies. And like, who are you? So what are you saying? - I'm automatically wrong (irrespective of the facts) because they're respected design agency and I'm a nobody - You didn't understand what I wrote. - you disagree with a specific point that you're not bothering to mention >Haters gonna hate. I'm not a hater. I'm at most a mocker. In particular I find it amusing that their own website fails to follow the vision that they advocate for other peoples. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"