"Barry C. Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Thanks for the responses guys.  It's odd to me that such a small file
> would have failed to download properly when so many others were
> downloaded during the same process without issue.  I will chalk this
> one up to experience and (hopefully ;^) ) remember it for the future.

I don't think the file had problems downloading; I think you just had
an old copy.  The filename has no version information built in, so
when they change it, the new version has the same name, but a
different checksum.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to