On Sunday 12 October 2003 09:09 pm, Jem Matzan wrote:
> I'm writing a review of FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE and part of the review
> entails outlining the significant differences between FreeBSD and
> GNU/Linux (in a general sense).
>
> These are the points that I plan on writing about:
>
> Development philosophy
> Development process
> Delivery and installation of ported programs and packages
> Cohesiveness of the kernel and the userland
> The licensing
>
> Most of these I can handle on my own, but I'd like to add some official
> comments from FreeBSD committers and contributors regarding development
> philosophy and process. Also if you feel that I've left out something
> important from the above list, please turn me on to it.
> Thanks for taking the time to respond to my request.
I dunno - but it seems to me that if someone, or some entity is going to write
a review, the review is based on the reviewers experiance.
to me, anything else would be considered hear-say, and really not a review at
all. More, an opinion from other sources. That being said, the sources
paraphrased would not represent a fair review in the othe camps eye.
I might suggest simply doing a head to head eval of a distro of Linux, give it
30 days, then do the same with FBSD. Then, and only then (in my eyes) could
you actually, and fairly write a review.
Just my 2 pennies.
X
--
Best regards,
Chris
______________________________________________________________________
PGP Fingerprint = D976 2575 D0B4 E4B0 45CC AA09 0F93 FF80 C01B C363
PGP Mail encouraged / preferred - keys available on common key servers
______________________________________________________________________
01010010011000010110001101100101011100100101100000000000
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
