Heh- wasn't the joys of C vs C++ enough? ;-) Really not much else to say on it- different people have different reasons, just as some people use only a single / filesystem. I don't, except in the case of what used to be a triple OS booting laptop...some of my preferences I think are pretty 'standard,' others by running out of disk space or filling up the 'wrong' filesystem, or simply trying to keep large or growing filesystems 'sane.'...but sane to me, may not be to someone else ;-)Hi Tom- /usr doesn't _have_ to be mounted read-only, but it's not uncommon to do it on systems connected to the net/susceptible to hacking/just for security. Default Sun for home is /export home, primarily b/c Solaris thinks it's always the NFS server ;-) Most Linux distros use /home, and I'll admit I'm not positive what freeBSD uses as a default, but I expect it to be /home and again, NOT under the /usr tree- home directories contain dynamic, changing data. The /usr filesystem remains static aside from the occasional app that 'must' be installed into /usr/local, or adding vendor packages (think base packages or ports installed for freeBSD), which once it's set up for a production system, may actually stay static for years in some cases (with the possible exception of security fixes depending on the environment). Again, mounting the home dir as /usr/home would preclude you from ever even considering mounting /usr as read-only (or 'immutable' is I _think_ the other freeBSD option?)
So, not sure why your system is set up the way it is, but fairly likely it was done that way because of mis-judging disk space requirements, or the way the drive(s) were partitioned... you can always create a new home dir and copy it over via: rm -f /home (removes symlink) mkdir /home cd /usr/home tar cvf - . | (cd /home && tar xvf - )
Thanks again Scott. I understand what you're saying about /usr being for mainly static data and this stacks up with what I've read about Linux and FreeBSD. So I was very surprised when I installed 4.9-RELEASE on a brand new machine (completely blank disks) and it made /home as a symlink to /usr/home! But this seems to be the default for FreeBSD.
I'm half way through creating new filesystems for 'home' and 'export' and copying the data across (thanks for the tar tip) and I just have to decide where to mount them.
Chris Howells suggests mounting the 'home' filesystem at /usr/home and I think he is suggesting that 'export' would mount at /usr/home/export. This contradicts what you have said above so I'm confused!
Chris/Scott - I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this.
Oh, I don't think Chris said anything about mounting export _under_ home- export is more of a 'sanity' thing when you have a ton of growing filesystems- on some systems, you really don't know going into it just how much storage you may wind up attaching, OR what it might be used for, etc...so imposing a _consistent_ layout from the start (eg, anything that will be exported via NFS goes under /export/* , which generally includes home directories which become /export/home (and you can always symlink back to /home if you'd like, unsure if freeBSDs automounter does things the same as Solaris. Likewise, if you were also going to run Samba to export shares to Windoze systems, in an ideal world you'd find a combination where both Unix and Windows files might co-exist under a user's home directory, if they/you are manipulating/editing in both platforms (OpenOffice or apps under WINE, etc), music shared (which uhh, I never do of course.. ;-) under /export/music etc etc....and /usr/* IMHO simply should not have 'data' in it, or anything that has the capability to be changed often..
One of the nice things about freeBSD is that most *nixes have for years tried to impose 'the right way' to do things with respect to directory layout...freeBSD seems to be the first I've seen that does it consistently, although differently in some cases (/usr/local/etc)...anyways, the point is- don't ruin that, for your OWN sanity's sake. If you don't like my personal preferences, come up with something that makess sense to YOU, and that won't drive you insane 5 years down the road when you STILL might have some of the same disks, or at least data copied over to new disks...
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"