OK for a small number of devices, but not down the road when the possibility for a sizeable number of transiently mounted devices could clutter up / . It would be 'less terrible' if a few 'classes' of mounts were created as part of the standard, with actual devices/filesystems below each, although the potential to overly clutter / still exists.The folks at the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS) are discussing (again) where directories for recurring temporary mount points should go. Recurring temporary mount points are for things like cdroms, floppies, and digital cameras as well as HD partitions from other OSes (like MS Windows).
Red Hat started putting these in /mnt (e.g. /mnt/cdrom), but that totally breaks compatibility with the BSDs, which have specified /mnt as an empty directory for ad hoc temporary mounts. SuSE has started putting these in /media, and now folks on the FHS list would like to know what people in the BSDs' communities would prefer.
I imagine your answer will be something like "We don't care; do what you want," but I would like to present the different ideas, and perhaps you would prefer one.
So, please put these in the order of most to least preferred, and say why you like or dislike any of them.
- All mount points in / (e.g. /cdrom, /camera, /windows/C) <- current
Example: /audio /audio/ipod /audio/generic
/video/ /video/sonycam /video/generic
etc...actually, I think I'm still less than crazy about this one ;-)
- All mount points in /mnt (e.g. /mnt/cdrom, /mnt/camera, /mnt/windows/C)Don't like it, as others have stated, too many of us are in the habit of having an 'empty' /mnt , unless we chose to create subdirectories, and I often mount something I know will be used short-term only at /mnt and use it as a single point, instant mount point for 'whatever' I'm mounting temporarily.
FreeBSD standard for an empty /mnt
- Anyplace at allNope. This just leads to obnoxious workarounds and/or additional configuration files for developing software that needs to use either. Again, using a 'device class heirarchy' comes to mind, like a 'whereis mountd', where a program could ask for the location of a specified class of device, and then in turn scan any mounted devices, but this one's a BIT out of scope of the FS project ;-)
- Anyplace but /mnt (i.e. what the FHS 2.2 currently specifies)K, but same as above, although I suppose it depends if they are looking to only define a single top level directory, or possibly more than one, eg subdirectory/mount points?
- Anyplace but / or /mnt (e.g. /vol/cdrom, /var/mnt/camera,As long as it's consistent and not ALL of the above for the given devices ;-) Again, prefer a single dir entry into /, which can grow as need be...
(some suggestions have been /media, /mounts, /vol, /var/mnt,/trans = transient
and /var/tmp/removable. Others?)
/media (SuSe way) is OK but possibly limiting (thinking of video and other devices that may possibly be mountable instead of accessing via /dev/*)
/vol I'm OK with but fairly sure it's being used somewhere already...Solaris?
/tfs = temp (or transient) file systems, but doesn't exactly roll off the keyboard..
/fs = easy to type, easy to remember (filesystems), OK by me ;-)
/tmp is already taken, drat ;-)
Thanks letting us know how you feel about this,
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"