Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 21 Nov 2003 22:22:38 -0500 > Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is exactly what Kerberos is good at. It's harder to administer > > than NIS, but doesn't require as much trust of the client machines. > > For yet another set of security profiles, LDAP can be useful. > > > > All of these (and, in fact, any scheme that remotely meets the rough > > criteria given) will require configuration on each client as well as > > the server. > > Yeah, know where I can actually find info on doing it thought? The handbook is a > little short on that... it has one small vague section...
NIS and Kerberos5 both have their own sections in the Handbook. With pointers off to more (general) information. For LDAP, I don't offhand know of a good source of information on its pros and cons, but installing it is as simple as using the pam_ldap port and following the directions it prints out after install. To get more specific help, you'll need to be more specific in your questions, I'm afraid. Good luck. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
