On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:59:25AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> It sounds to me as if your new machine has hardware which is supported
> under 5.x but not 4.9. That's a very good reason to install 5.2 --
> caveats about "early adopters" notwithstanding, by all accounts 5.2 is
> turning out nicely. I'd worry about using it for a system that was
> mission critical to a business (read: financial consequences if it
> isn't up and running), but for a home system I think it would do very
I'm going toput 5.2 on my new DNS server; but from scratch.
SWondering how dificult it is to upgrade from 4. to 5.[latest].
Is the UPGRADING file suffieient? I've heard the 5.X is the
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"