On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:59:25AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > It sounds to me as if your new machine has hardware which is supported > under 5.x but not 4.9. That's a very good reason to install 5.2 -- > caveats about "early adopters" notwithstanding, by all accounts 5.2 is > turning out nicely. I'd worry about using it for a system that was > mission critical to a business (read: financial consequences if it > isn't up and running), but for a home system I think it would do very > well. >
I'm going toput 5.2 on my new DNS server; but from scratch. SWondering how dificult it is to upgrade from 4.[78] to 5.[latest]. Is the UPGRADING file suffieient? I've heard the 5.X is the cat's meow.... tia, gary > -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"