On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 08:59:25AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> It sounds to me as if your new machine has hardware which is supported
> under 5.x but not 4.9.  That's a very good reason to install 5.2 --
> caveats about "early adopters" notwithstanding, by all accounts 5.2 is
> turning out nicely.  I'd worry about using it for a system that was
> mission critical to a business (read: financial consequences if it
> isn't up and running), but for a home system I think it would do very
> well.

        I'm going toput 5.2 on my new DNS server; but from scratch.
        SWondering how dificult it is to upgrade from 4.[78] to 5.[latest].
        Is the UPGRADING file suffieient?  I've heard the 5.X is the
        cat's meow....



   Gary Kline     [EMAIL PROTECTED]   www.thought.org     Public service Unix

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to