On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:09:48PM -0800, Loren M. Lang typed: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:32:34PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:04:36PM -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote: > > > > > > You may want to start by looking into the net/nss_ldap and security/pam_ldap > > > > ports. Beyond that, I don't know what to tell you. > > > > > > nss_ldap claims it requires freebsd 5.1 or newer when I try to install > > > it, if there is someway to be able to still use it on freebsd, I > > > would like to know. > > > > Er, install FreeBSD 5.1 or newer to use it on FreeBSD. > > This is a production mail server in an enviroment mixed with win2k > file servers that share the same users. Would FreeBSD 5.2 be stable > enough to use or is there another alternative? Perhaps something not > requiring nss? We've been using 5.x in production on different boxes since 5.1 because we needed the nss_* functionality. It's been nothing but stable (especially compared to the win2k servers they have to communicate with).
Your mileage may vary, but I'd say go for it. Ruben > > > > Kris > > > > !DSPAM:400e0f09200042161831658! > > -- > I sense much NT in you. > NT leads to Bluescreen. > Bluescreen leads to downtime. > Downtime leads to suffering. > NT is the path to the darkside. > Powerful Unix is. > > Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc > Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C > _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
