On Saturday 06 March 2004 11:29 am, Chris wrote:
> On Saturday 06 March 2004 11:25 am, Mark wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kirk Strauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 5:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Where is 4.9-STABLE?
> > > At 2004-03-06T14:53:44Z, "Remko Lodder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > and do a make world
> > >
> > > Mark: don't literally do a "make world". Follow the instructions
> > > in /usr/src/UPDATING instead.
> Doing a make world is perfectly acceptable. It's considered the
> "traditional" way of doing things, and accomplishes the same results.
> If your going to inform users NOT to do one way opposed to another, at
> least give specifics as to why you feel that way.
To follow up - the reason for the UPDATING file and the layout of rebuilding
your system is to guide users that are upgrading from 4.x to 5.x
You will see vast changes in the way the kernel is handled in 5.x along
However, reading that file explains this in detail. Simply moving from
4.9-RELEASE to 4.9-STABLE and the patches isn't considered a major upgrade.
A simple rebuild of the kernel and a simple make world does work well in this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"