So far I only see argument agains top-posting. If it makes sense for you, perhaps you could give a couple of arguments wy you think its a good idee.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 05:35:06PM -0500, Al Johnson wrote: > I'm with you... Top-posting makes the most sense for me. I doubt it. > I was born to top-post. It would make sence if you have a mailer that handels threads and you are accully following the whole thread. On second thougth: in this case you could just as easly delete the whole mail. You don't read it any how. It doesn't make sence for ppl who don't have a mailer with thread capabilty or don't read the whole thread. > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:28:24PM -0800, Charles McManis wrote: > > Perhaps it isn't "logical", if you've read all the email then the quoted > > thread is just reference anyway. This is the "new stuff". I love being able > > to read mail in the preview-pane vs "next message" , jump to the bottom, > > "next message" jump to the bottom. > > > > It comes down to opinion I think How much sence did this make? -- Alex _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"