Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right? C'mon guys. This sort of thing belies a total lack of concern when changes are MFC'd into production branches of the code. This kind of thing is expected if you're running -CURRENT, but not -STABLE.
How long would it have taken to actually test the change and detect this once it was put in? All of 30 seconds? -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 08:23:10PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > On Saturday 09 September 2006 19:38, Karl Denninger wrote: > > This is not cool folks. > > Want a refund? > > -- > /"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 > X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
