On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was
that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed
stable ...
You mean like in the FreeBSD handbook? It's not anyone else's fault
if you haven't read the documentation.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html
I swear, the last time I searched for a definition of STABLE vs
CURRENT/HEAD, that wsan't there ... but, granted, that was a very very
long time ago ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
