On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:16:29PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
This should be documented somewhere clearly then, as my understanding was
that -STABLE meant that anything MFCd back to it *was* tested and deemed
stable ...
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/version-guide/decision-points.html
but "blantant and obvious bugs due to insufficient testing", IMHO, doesn't
classify as an 'oops' ....
You've already made this point -- 3 times. What would you like us to do
now, punish the committer?
Huh? My first post on this thread was in defense of MFCng into STABLE and
acknowledging that 'mistakes happen', and then this one ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
