On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 07:08:21PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > As the subject says, on my 6-stable systems ntpd just sits there and does > nothing.... > > It seems what ntpd has in complexity it lacks in robustness. I'd prefer to > have > openntpd in the base system. It seems to be very simple. And it works.
Eh; seems to work for me:
g1-18(6.2-S)[1] ntpdc -np
remote local st poll reach delay offset disp
=======================================================================
*172.16.8.12 172.17.1.18 4 128 377 0.00322 -0.003667 0.00871
g1-18(6.2-S)[2] uname -a
FreeBSD g1-18.catwhisker.org. 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #453: Wed Jul 18
06:40:27 PDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
g1-18(6.2-S)[3]
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anything and everything is a (potential) cat toy.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpYeAGAzj7iu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
