On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Q. Can we change the name from "usb2_" to my favorite name? A. No. This
is for a short period, stop being so annoying.
Why not just "usb_"? You can then leave it as is then avoiding violating
POLA second time. Otherwise people would confuse it with USB 2.0.
P.S. I am talking about entries for kernel config here, not about names of
directories and source files.
With the move to Subversion, there's a significantly lower technical barrier
to renaming files in the tree, especially if they exist only in HEAD. Let's
assume that, when the time comes to remove the old USB implementation, we will
do whatever renaming of directories, files, and symbols that may make sense.
That is to say, let's leave the names as-is and focus on the semantics.
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
