Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Q. Can we change the name from "usb2_" to my favorite name? A. No.
This is for a short period, stop being so annoying.
Why not just "usb_"? You can then leave it as is then avoiding
violating POLA second time. Otherwise people would confuse it with
USB 2.0.
P.S. I am talking about entries for kernel config here, not about
names of directories and source files.
With the move to Subversion, there's a significantly lower technical
barrier to renaming files in the tree, especially if they exist only in
HEAD. Let's assume that, when the time comes to remove the old USB
implementation, we will do whatever renaming of directories, files, and
symbols that may make sense. That is to say, let's leave the names as-is
and focus on the semantics.
See my other e-mail. I am talking about entries for kernel config here,
not about names of directories and source files.
-Maxim
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
