On Saturday 20 August 2011 16:30:17 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR usb/159919; it has been noted by GNATS.
> From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <p...@phk.freebsd.dk>
> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@c2i.net>
> Cc: email@example.com, freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: usb/159919: Patch for HUAWEI E173 (u3g/umodem)
> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:07:25 +0000
> In message <201108201555.04355.hsela...@c2i.net>, Hans Petter Selasky
> >On Friday 19 August 2011 18:01:29 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> With this patch I can get a Huawei E173 3G dongle to work.
> >> I'm not sure why I have to teach umodem about it specifically.
> >> It comes up as /dev/cuaU rather than /dev/cuaU0.
> >What happens if you leave out the u3g.c patch?
> >Could you post dmesg and output from:
> >usbconfig -d X.Y dump_device_desc dump_curr_config_desc show_ifdrv
> Dang, I should have thought of including that.
> It's too late now the E173 just passed through my lab for a few
> hours and it probably won't be back in the forseeable future.
> Without any patches it comes up with the E173_INIT product-id and
> da0/cd0 attaches.
> The HUAWEI_INIT mode just hangs the device, nothing happens or
> attaches afterwards.
> With the HUAWEI_INITSCSI it disaspears, then comes back with the E173
> product-id, da0/cd0 attaches, but umodem for some reason does not.
> The patch makes umodem find it, but as three separate devices,
> not as one device with three subdevices.
I found a descriptor dump here:
I see now why the u3g.c driver is not attaching, because "bDeviceClass = 0"
and we expect 0xFF.
Nick, do you have any comments on this?
PHK: Are you on #bsdusb on EF-net?
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"