Hm, that sounds right, what's the code doing wrong?


Adrian


On 15 February 2013 17:09, PseudoCylon <moonlightak...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/net80211/ieee80211_ht.c?#L2656
> Shouldn't a sta include iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density instead
> when associating?
>
> 1) A driver initiates iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density based on h/w
> capabilities.
>
> 2) When a sta trying to associate,
> ieee80211_send_mgmt()
> {
>         case IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_ASSOC_REQ:
>             ieee80211_add_htcap();    /* the function in question */
> }
>
> 3) When an ap receives the assoc_req packet, the ap will save ht
> params to ni_htparam. Then the ap will use those values for Tx
> packets.
>
> 4) The sta will receive packets which size is within the limits if the
> sta included iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density.
>
>
> AK
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to