Hm, that sounds right, what's the code doing wrong?
On 15 February 2013 17:09, PseudoCylon <moonlightak...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Shouldn't a sta include iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density instead
> when associating?
> 1) A driver initiates iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density based on h/w
> 2) When a sta trying to associate,
> case IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_ASSOC_REQ:
> ieee80211_add_htcap(); /* the function in question */
> 3) When an ap receives the assoc_req packet, the ap will save ht
> params to ni_htparam. Then the ap will use those values for Tx
> 4) The sta will receive packets which size is within the limits if the
> sta included iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density.
> firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"