On 20 February 2013 20:38, PseudoCylon <moonlightak...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> Who can we rope in to review whether this is being done "right" ?
> Since it is ht param issue, anyone with 11n capable hardware with
> working driver, or anyone with an AP which can tell Tx'd ampdu packets
> are smaller than what the station has asked for.
> run(4) still generates lots of Rx errors. I cannot tell if the patch
> does any good. I can only tell the AP does receive the driver defined
> ht param, now.
When doing aggregation? Try upping the ampdu density to something like
8 or 16 microseconds, maybe it needs more spacing between frames.
What are you using as a transmitter in your run(4) tests?
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"