On 20 February 2013 20:38, PseudoCylon <moonlightak...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> Who can we rope in to review whether this is being done "right" ? > > Since it is ht param issue, anyone with 11n capable hardware with > working driver, or anyone with an AP which can tell Tx'd ampdu packets > are smaller than what the station has asked for. > > run(4) still generates lots of Rx errors. I cannot tell if the patch > does any good. I can only tell the AP does receive the driver defined > ht param, now. When doing aggregation? Try upping the ampdu density to something like 8 or 16 microseconds, maybe it needs more spacing between frames. What are you using as a transmitter in your run(4) tests? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"