I have no plans to backport this to stable, sorry. :(
On 20 March 2013 19:43, Joshua Isom <jri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/19/2013 10:31 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 19 March 2013 12:39, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I've just committed some new RX handling code. Since the RX FIFO on
>>> the AR9380 and later chips is very shallow (128 entries), you have to
>>> refill the FIFO much quicker than you can handle frames.
>> .. and an AR9390 STA -> AR9380 AP at MCS24 is giving me around 230mbit
>> My goal is to hit 200mbit TCP on 2x2 and 300mbit TCP on 3x3.
>> But, I won't complain about getting to 230mbit this early in the game.
> Any tips for backporting the code to -STABLE? Currently I had to comment
> out the scsi cd driver because it was causing kernel panics. Now I'm getting
> kernel panics from geom_io.c due to a failed assert.
> firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"