Good day! 2009/9/3 Marko Lindqvist wrote: > I have noticed that more and more people name their patches as .patch. > It would be easier for me if they were named .diff.
Not a problem, but why? (Is it an issue with mailer, system, mailman, whatever else?) Also, .patch looks like standard in packages (like rpms.) > And while I'm at it, I also prefer patches that are relative to parent > dir of freeciv = ones that I can apply as "patch -u -p1 -d freeciv.src > < patch.diff". git-diff seems to have no possibility of this... -- Thanks, evyscr _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
