2009/9/3 Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> I have noticed that more and more people name their patches as .patch.
> It would be easier for me if they were named .diff.
Not a problem, but why? (Is it an issue with mailer, system, mailman,
whatever else?) Also, .patch looks like standard in packages (like
> And while I'm at it, I also prefer patches that are relative to parent
> dir of freeciv = ones that I can apply as "patch -u -p1 -d freeciv.src
> < patch.diff".
git-diff seems to have no possibility of this...
Freeciv-dev mailing list