Follow-up Comment #2, patch #1444 (project freeciv):

> I doubt the user need so much details about where the setting
> stuff has failed (e.g. file and line). Don't forget that most
> of those messages are returned to normal users. 

The additional information about the file and line could be removed (or only
be added in debug builds).
> I guess a such patch is not really needed. It would slow down
> the stuff every time a setting packet is sent, because
> messages are not required in those cases.

Is it really such a slowdown to save a message in a string? I don't know how
often the settings code is called and how much time one call needs ...


Reply to this item at:


  Nachricht geschickt von/durch Gna!

Freeciv-dev mailing list

Reply via email to