Follow-up Comment #1, patch #3879 (project freeciv):

>or by changing the word used to be something positive.
I agree.
>Note that the introduction of nreqs uses an entirely different mechanism than
that suggested in patch #3332
The mechanism was wrong and my original idea was confuse. My purpose was the
patch #1342, where requirement_vector nreqs replaced obsoleted_by. This was
the second step.

The first step was in patch #1339, where requirement_vector reqs replaced the
fields require_advance, need_improvement and need_government.

Same for patch #1341 and #1340.


Reply to this item at:


  Message sent via/by Gna!

Freeciv-dev mailing list

Reply via email to