Follow-up Comment #7, patch #3879 (project freeciv):

> With most terms the problem seems to be that they don't make it
> clear that FALSE -> requirement is not allowed to be present,
> rather than just being not really a requirement.

Idea for potential future ticket: What if it wasn't boolean (TRUE/FALSE) in
ruleset format, but the strings used there were "present"/"absent", which
ruleset loading code then would just convert to internal boolean
representation?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/patch/?3879>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Reply via email to