Follow-up Comment #3, bug #24053 (project freeciv):
I think the solution has two parts.
1) When there's two scenarios with the same name, client should prefer one
with higher *format* version (2.6 savegame over 2.5 savegame). (a)
2) Before 2.6 gets released, we update Europe_1901 format to 2.6 as then it's
possible to keep it maintained in that stable format (freeciv-2.6 exist)
a) Preferably there would be internal version number for the scanarios as a
secondary criteria, but currently there isn't and I'm not sure what would be a
good way to add one in 2.6 (main concern in simplistic approach: what happens
when one just converts 2.6 savegame to 3.0 savegame in respect to internal
version numbers - we don't want scenario authors to get lost with their
version numbering and making *correct* version unavailable)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?24053>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
