-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/31/2011 04:22 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
> capacity to de-anonymize users on the same circuit. I don't see why the > FreedomBox Foundation would want to recommend this, as it doesn't make > sense from a political or technical standpoint. If anything, it might hurt acceptance of Freedombox for recommending a bad practice to users. Deliberately suggesting an anonymity-breaking practice could also be turned into FUD. Now, if you wanted to suggest something that could be used as a BitTorrent client and did take steps to try to preserve the privacy and anonymity of users, like OneSwarm (http://csemike.github.com/OneSwarm/), you might have something. - -- The Doctor [412/724/301/703] PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1 WWW: http://drwho.virtadpt.net/ Never mistake high blood-caffeine levels for being a morning person. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3mVekACgkQO9j/K4B7F8GcrACglnph3320pmi1YVFRfG6WiWmd f3AAn3v8P0JA58oBNin5KYLB2URWWIFs =XlpG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
