Alain
Eric Auer escreveu: > HIMEM /TESTMEM:... is indeed not that useful. An exist-check might be > useful, but a check like "write own address to all 0x?????000 form > addresses" (to check if there is really RAM there and it is not > multiple copies of the first 16 MB or something) will probably be > useful to detect broken BIOS-hooking memory allocation schemes > without wasting much CPU time.
tom ehlert escreveu:
A> As bad as is MS's is, it did save me many times. Consider it not a A> _test_for_100%_ok_ but as a _test_if_exists_ andhimem /TESTMEM:ON|OFF really want a (bad) memory test in 1.0 ?
I disagree.
If you want a memorytest (I don't question that), you can easily start
one in autoexec; even HIMEM /TEST might be useful
it's NOT intended to be a real memtest, but if you want one ...
A> you can understand how good it is. if you understand how good it is (or _any_ other memtest) you have more information then I (and a VERY technical understanding of it)
In fact I did have some information in memory tests, but that was a long time ago and probably a little outdated.
Alain
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel