On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, tom ehlert wrote: > Checking MSDOS 6.2, the kernel doesn't move the EBDA if no UMB is > found.
MSDOS 7.10 does move the EBDA though. What MSDOS are we looking at now -- the FAT16 kernel says 5.0, and the FAT32 says 7.10 ? > in the default setting, moving the EBDA doesn't save any memory; > setting switches /E:512 might enable 'MOVEEBDA' and would save low memory Lucho had his reasons to implement it in the first place -- I have no idea why we suddenly have all these problems surfacing after >6 monts. I also wonder if we don't have a bug somewhere? I can't remember stories of people being forced to use "SWITCHES=/E" for Windows 98. I agree it's probably safer to not move it by default but I'd like to know where the problem really is. Bart ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
