On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Rugxulo wrote:

> I don't know if they're "hidden", just that usually they aren't
> directly exposed to users in default tools. You can still access the
> file with either name.

Yeah.  Do a "dir /x" in Windows 7 and you'll see that it still makes 8.3 
filenames.

> DVD image files (and mostly only useful for HD re-encoding, right?)
> are the only real-world use case that is constantly mentioned for
> needing to support greater than 4+ GB files in FreeDOS. And as such
> optical media support is already a bit difficult (not the least of
> which is proper ASPI driver support), it makes it less appealing to
> developers.

I've seen some mammoth video files, apart from dvdisos and bdmvs... but 
then why would you want those on a DOS machine? ~.^

But my files don't get that big individually - the biggest ones are 
probably just above 2 GB, and most far smaller.  (I do a lot of video 
work.)

-uso.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to