On 1/2/2015 12:30 PM, Mercury Thirteen wrote: > Well, I wasn't advocating that we leave behind our "16-bit roots" > altogether, because it is possible to still run 16- as well as 32-bit > code on a 32-bit OS.Then again, if we go to a 32-bit kernel and still > run 16-bit code... exactly what have we gained? Like I said before, I > can see both sides of this debate. > What exactly would you mean by "32 bit kernel"? What is "the kernel"? I always get the impression that people that mention stuff like this don't know how DOS works and take their "inspiration" from Linux or other, similar sized and focused OS...
Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
