I would consider it more of a bug in Windows' emulation of DOS...

Also, in my experience, Win32 executables tend to run faster than DOS
executables on Windows.

On 6/9/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 9-Июн-2006 21:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
> freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
>
>  >> >> PS: There is bug in OpenWatcom binw\wlink, when it produces correpted
>  >> >> executable, when runs in DOSbox. So, you should be sure, that under
> Windows
>  >> >> you run tools from binnt\, not binw\ directory.
> BC> Which is the way it SHOULD be anyways  :-)   ( Why would anyone want to
> BC> use DOS hosted tools if they're running windows??)
>
> 1. Common configuration files (with pathes).
> 2. Why not?
> 3. binw\wlink doesn't rejects to run - it works, but _silently_ produces
>     corrupted executable (some offsets in code calculated wrong).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
>


-- 
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
   David Letterman (1947 - )

See ya

_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to