I would consider it more of a bug in Windows' emulation of DOS... Also, in my experience, Win32 executables tend to run faster than DOS executables on Windows.
On 6/9/06, Arkady V.Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > 9-Июн-2006 21:13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to > [email protected]: > > >> >> PS: There is bug in OpenWatcom binw\wlink, when it produces correpted > >> >> executable, when runs in DOSbox. So, you should be sure, that under > Windows > >> >> you run tools from binnt\, not binw\ directory. > BC> Which is the way it SHOULD be anyways :-) ( Why would anyone want to > BC> use DOS hosted tools if they're running windows??) > > 1. Common configuration files (with pathes). > 2. Why not? > 3. binw\wlink doesn't rejects to run - it works, but _silently_ produces > corrupted executable (some offsets in code calculated wrong). > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user > -- Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees. David Letterman (1947 - ) See ya _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
