Hi!
9-Июн-2006 21:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Blair Campbell) wrote to
[email protected]:
>> >> 3. binw\wlink doesn't rejects to run - it works, but _silently_ produces
>> >> corrupted executable (some offsets in code calculated wrong).
BC> I would consider it more of a bug in Windows' emulation of DOS...
Wlink _works_. Works _fine_. Issue is that it only wrongly calculates
_some_ offsets in code. So, this is definitely bug in Wlink. Especially
because any other DOS4GW programs (including, for example, WCC and WPP)
works as expected.
BC> Also, in my experience, Win32 executables tend to run faster than DOS
BC> executables on Windows.
This is another story.
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
