>Eric: Hi, sorry to bother you, but could you send me the results for some other values ...
Here they are, lba 128 0,0, lba 1024 0,0 and qcache 9,512. Free Memory: _________________ Conventional _ Upper _ Extended (XMS) QCACHE ________ STACKS=0,0 ____ 624 _________ 42 ____ 1,493,529 LBACACHE 128 __ STACKS=0,0 __ 624 _________ 40 ____ 1,493,529 QCACHE ________ STACKS=9,256 __ 624 _________ 39 ____ 1,493,529 LBACACHE 1024 _ STACKS=0,0 __ 624 _________ 39 ____ 1,492,633 QCACHE /X _____ STACKS=9,512 __ 624 _________ 38 ____ 1,493,529 QCACHE ________ STACKS=9,512 __ 624 _________ 37 ____ 1,493,529 LBACACHE 1024 _ STACKS=9,256 __ 624 _________ 37 ____ 1,492,633 LBACACHE 2048 _ STACKS=9,256 __ 624 _________ 36 ____ 1,491,601 LBACACHE 2048 _ STACKS=9,384 __ 624 _________ 35 ____ 1,491,609 LBACACHE 8192 _ STACKS=0,0 ____ 624 _________ 32 ____ 1,485,465 LBACACHE 8192 _ STACKS=9,256 __ 624 _________ 30 ____ 1,485,465 LBACACHE 8192 _ STACKS=9,384 __ 624 _________ 29 ____ 1,485,465 LBACACHE 8192 _ STACKS=9,512 __ 624 _________ 27 ____ 1,485,465 ------ >Eric: can you find out in what way qxumbpci is better than umbpci, for example by comparing the docs? I thing differences are small... Maybe someone more familiar with qxumbpci could comment here. Lester ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
