On 09/27/2012 10:50 PM, dmccunney wrote:
> Every user will have a preferred organization.  One size will not fit all.

Yes indeed. That's why I believe the way to go will be using so,e env 
variables to store installation paths to software (dosdir, gamesdir, 
appsdir, develdir for starters, other might follow...)

> I'm opposed to that sort of config directory.  To the extent it makes
> sense, that should be user specifiable, too.  Most apps under FreeDOS
> will have app specific configs that won't live in a global config
> directory, and will usually be found in the same directory where the
> app is installed.

In fact, I was thinking about only FreeDOS core tools (that is, these 
that would go install themselves into %DOSDIR%). The vast majority of 
3rd party software will have to be installed in their own directories 
anyway, with all files together (binaries, data, configs, etc) - because 
that's the way DOS software were usually designed to work. But FreeDOS 
core tools could be an exception here - in fact, FreeDOS already uses 
several directories for different purposes: %DOSDIR%\bin for binaries, 
%DOSDIR%\nls for translations, %DOSDIR%\help for man files, etc... some 
kind of %DOSDIR%\cfg directory would just extend that idea a little further.

bye,
Mateusz


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to