I have not posted on this forum in almost 5 months due to the
rather VICIOUS attacks on me by Bret Johnson, Ralf Quint, and
Tom Ehlert re: diskette detection in the UIDE drivers.
However, this post has now become necessary.
Shown below is an E-Mail which I received early this morning,
from Christian Pfaller of Germany (forwarded by Johnson Lam).
Pfaller's problem is most likely a direct result of the logic
I added with the 29-May-2012 UIDE, which tests for up to four
diskettes using BIOS calls, instead of testing for only 2 via
directly checking the BIOS diskette-flags byte. That change
was made by me "under duress", i.e. by the above damn FleaDOS
"pundits" INSISTING I obey the Ralf Brown lists and issue the
BIOS calls, so damn "VirtualBox" could be run without its OWN
diskette-detection problems getting CORRECTED!!
Pfaller indicates the last UIDE version which worked with his
LS120 drives was 20-May-2012, the version BEFORE I put in the
diskette BIOS calls.
I shall immediately PUT BACK the diskette test logic from the
20-May-2012 UIDE into the current UHDD/UIDE drivers. After
appropriate checking by me, Johnson, and Christian Pfaller, I
shall release an updated set of drivers on Johnson's website.
Eric, if your "VBOXFIX" program is still available, you might
want to re-issue it, with its specific logic to test the bits
in the BIOS diskette flag byte for the presence of diskettes,
when "VirtualBox" is used. I intend to use that byte again,
and NOT use BIOS calls to check for diskettes! You may also
want to INSIST that the "VirtualBox" emulator fools FIX their
diskette-detection logic to post the BIOS diskette-flags byte
properly, which would have AVOIDED all of this mess!
Now, I will again "unsubscribe" from FD-User. And I hope NO
ONE expects me to listen to any of its "pundits" ever again!!
Jack R. Ellis
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Problem with the UIDE Cache and "LS120" Diskette Drives.
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:03:58 +0000
From: MR-LEGO <mr-lego...@web.de>
To: Jack R. Ellis [forwarded from johnsonlam...@gmail.com]
Dear Mr Ellis.
Thank you for your great drivers. They work very fine.
But I have a problem with the UIDE cache in conjunction with an "LS120"
Diskette Drive. I found the problem by checking three LS120 diskettes
on last Friday. Yesterday and today I made some several tests with it.
I use the latest version [2012-08-04] of UIDE.
For example I load UIDE with the parameter "/S25" (with 25MB-cache).
If I check now a LS120 diskette with DOSFSCHK, it told me that the first
and the second FAT are not be the same.
Now I load UIDE with the parameter "/B" (basic, without cache).
Then I check the LS120 diskette with DOSFSCHK, no errors were found.
If I make a 1:1 image of a LS120 diskette and UIDE-cache is loaded,
the content of the image isn't the same as the diskette.
Now I make a 1:1 image of a LS120 diskette without the UIDE-cache,
the content of the image is the same as the diskette.
This problem only appears with the "LS120" Diskette Drive.
I tested UIDE under FreeDOS and MS-DOS and the result is the same.
I tested it on another computer with another "LS120" Diskette Drive, too.
The oldest version of UIDE [2012-05-20] I tested doesn't have this problem.
Many thanks for your help.
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
Freedos-user mailing list