On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 02:52:28PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: > On 23/02/2024 13:51, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:03:10PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >> On 23/02/2024 12:02, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >>> Thanks, Applied to https://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/drm/drm-misc.git > >>> (drm-misc-fixes) > >>> > >>> [1/6] drm/bridge: aux-hpd: fix OF node leaks > >>> > >>> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=9ee485bdda68d6d3f5728cbe3150eb9013d7d22b > >>> [2/6] drm/bridge: aux-hpd: separate allocation and registration > >>> (no commit info) > >>> [3/6] soc: qcom: pmic_glink_altmode: fix drm bridge use-after-free > >>> (no commit info) > >>> [4/6] soc: qcom: pmic_glink: Fix boot when QRTR=m > >>> (no commit info) > >>> [5/6] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: fix drm bridge registration > >>> (no commit info) > >>> [6/6] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: fix type-c switch registration > >>> (no commit info) > >>> > >> > >> To clarify, I only applied patch 1 to drm-misc-fixes > > > > Ok, but can you please not do that? :) > > > > These patches should go in through the same tree to avoid conflicts. > > > > I discussed this with Bjorn and Dmitry the other day and the conclusion > > was that it was easiest to take all of these through DRM. > > I only applied patch 1, which is a standalone fix and goes into a separate > tree, > for the next patches it would be indeed simpler for them to go via drm-misc > when > they are properly acked. But it is *not* standalone as I tried to explain above. So you have to drop it again as the later patches depend on it and cannot be merged (through a different tree) without it. I thought you had all the acks you needed to take this through drm-misc, but we can wait a bit more if necessary (and there's no rush to get the first one in). Johan
