On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 16:55, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstr...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 23/02/2024 15:52, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 03:38:13PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote: > >> On 23/02/2024 15:21, Johan Hovold wrote: > > > >>> But it is *not* standalone as I tried to explain above. > >>> > >>> So you have to drop it again as the later patches depend on it and > >>> cannot be merged (through a different tree) without it. > >> > >> drm-misc branches cannot be rebased, it must be reverted, but it can still > >> be applied > >> on drm-misc-next and I'll send a revert patch for drm-misc-fixes if > >> needed, not a big deal. > >> > >>> I thought you had all the acks you needed to take this through drm-misc, > >>> but we can wait a bit more if necessary (and there's no rush to get the > >>> first one in). > >> > >> If you want it to be in v6.9, it's too late since the last drm-misc-next > >> PR has been sent > >> yesterday > >> (https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/tag/?h=drm-misc-next-2024-02-22) > >> > >> Please ping Thomas or Maxime, perhaps it's not too late since the > >> drm-misc-next tree > >> really closes on sunday. > > > > I don't want this in 6.9, this is needed for *6.8* as this fixes a DRM > > regression in 6.8-rc1 that breaks the display on machines like the X13s. > > > > If you guys can't sort this out in time, then perhaps Bjorn can take > > this through the Qualcomm tree instead (with DRM acks). > > > > But again, this is fixing a severe *regression* in 6.8-rc1. It can not > > wait for 6.9. > > Right, I can't apply them right now, I send a patchset ack so it can be > applied ASAP,
Applied and pushed patches 2-4. Patches 5 and 6 can go through the phy/fixes. There is no need for them to go through drm-misc tree. -- With best wishes Dmitry
