On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 08:02 -0400, John Dennis wrote: > On 10/24/2012 04:40 AM, Martin Kosek wrote: > > I think I am just too conservative, but I am perfectly comfortable with my > > home-grown scripts which detect the next number(s) of sent patch, prepares > > me > > an e-mail with attachments I can further amend and the script also attaches > > the > > patch to Trac ticket. > > Yeah, I share your conservative approach. I usually don't allow my > script to automatically send an email via the -s option. It always > generates a "git format-patch" file whose filename matches IPA > conventions in an archive directory whether it sends it or not. I > usually skip automatic sending and instead compose an email and attach > the newest entry in the archive. That gives me a chance to review it and > add text.
Keep in mind the 2 aliases I sent do exactly this. One prepares patches with a cover letter, the second is for sending, you must review because you have to fill up the cover letter. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
