On 01/28/2014 09:35 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> On 01/23/2014 02:17 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> The URL endpoint /ipa/rest suggests that if we implement a complete REST
>> API for IPA it would live here. Is the API supposed to be
>> future-compatible? (The API itself seems to be a good subset of a
>> complete REST API, but can we easily add an frontend with
>> authentication, i18n, etc. here later, and keep the limitations for
>> unauthenticated access?)
>> Perhaps /ipa/smartproxy would be a better choice?
> It was future-proofing. I'm fine with changing the URI, it is probably a good
> thing to save that name.
+1 for moving to /ipa/smartproxy/rest, we will want a complete REST interface
in ipa/rest/ in the future. I rather opened a ticket to track that:
Freeipa-devel mailing list