On 04/18/2014 01:29 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 04/18/2014 10:52 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 04/18/2014 10:33 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
FYI - I saw numerous questions about "ipa" tool backward compatibility (the
most recent is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089015), so I
created a section about it:
http://www.freeipa.org/page/Client#Compatibility
and added it to FAQ.
Looking for the version in an internal module doesn't strike me as the best
method. Especially if you have to add a warning to not change the file. (And
changing it is just "discouraged"? Really?)
I specifically added the warning about changing it because this is what the
user in the Bugzilla did and I really want to discourage people doing that. If
you have better wording in mind, please feel free to improve :-)
I'd rather not mention it at all; saying "here is a stupid thing you
really shouldn't do" will just make people do it.
Should we add API version to the env, and recommend running `ipa env
api_version` instead?
Maybe. It would also not hurt to have --version option so that:
# ipa --version
Prints you the package and the API version...
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4316
--
Petr³
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
