On 14.5.2014 16:55, Gabe Alford wrote:
What are your thoughts on this? Added UID and SSSUID entities and cleaned
up the original patch down to a regular paragraph.
The text itself seems good. Can we think of a better names than UID and SSSUID?
Maybe something like MINUID and MINSSSUID? I don't know.
Conditional ACK: The patch can be pushed if we can find better names for
Thank you for your contribution!
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Petr Spacek <pspa...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 14.5.2014 01:05, Gabe Alford wrote:
I had a typo with the one of the UIDs which is fixed with this patch.
The difference is that Fedora/SSSD treats UIDs of 1000 and below as local
system accounts whereas RHEL treats local system accounts at 500 and SSSD
local system accounts at 1000. That's why there are conditional paragraphs
based on if it is Fedora or RHEL.
I think we should define entity (similar to &OS) for this purpose.
Please look at FreeIPA_Guide.ent and Identity_Management_Guide.ent.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com>
On 05/09/2014 04:14 AM, Gabe Alford wrote:
Just wondering if there are any takers in reviewing this patch.
Sorry, looks like it fell through the cracks :(
AFAIK the &OS; entity should work for both Fedora and RHEL, so it should
be possible to only have one copy of the paragraph. Or is there
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Gabe Alford <redhatri...@gmail.com
Patch for the following ticket to add note in documentation about
bad uid ranges:
Freeipa-devel mailing list