Thanks guys. Sounds like it would be better to submit a patch that removes app_PYTHON if it is considered dead code.
Gabe On Thursday, November 27, 2014, Petr Spacek <pspa...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 27.11.2014 11:00, Martin Basti wrote: > > On 27/11/14 00:50, Gabe Alford wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Wondering if I could get a review. Updated patch attached. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Gabe > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Gabe Alford <redhatri...@gmail.com > <javascript:;> > >> <mailto:redhatri...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>> wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Fix for https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4700 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Gabe > >> > >> > >> > > Hello, > > > > sorry for late response. > > > > We push this ticket to backlog, as it would be part of build system > refactoring. > > The "app_PYTHON" statement is not used anymore in IPA, the better > solution is > > remove it, instead of keeping dead code up-to-date. > > Just to clarify: > It can be pushed if it works, there is no need to postpone accepting patch > if > the patch seems okay and doesn't break anything. > > Martin, please keep in mind that contributions are welcome at any time. > > Milestones in Trac reflect our view of priorities but it doesn't prevent us > from accepting correct patches from contributions at any time, no matter > which > priority is stated in Trac (or even if there is no ticket for it ...). > > -- > Petr^2 Spacek > > _______________________________________________ > Freeipa-devel mailing list > Freeipa-devel@redhat.com <javascript:;> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel >
_______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
