On (22/11/16 16:29), Petr Spacek wrote: >On 22.11.2016 16:27, Jan Cholasta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 22.11.2016 16:04, Petr Spacek wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> the recent changes with regard to >>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Integration_Improvements >>> beg a question whether we should invest into supporting client-only builds >>> in >>> FreeIPA build system. >>> >>> Right now, FreeIPA can be built on all architectures we care about so there >>> is >>> no incentive to invest into client-only build - this applies to binary/RPM >>> builds. >> >> Client-only build lowers the barrier for porting IPA to new platforms >> (porting >> only client code is *much* easier than porting the whole thing), so I would >> very much prefer if we kept it. > >Understood. > Agree about portability
But upstream spec file needn't have such relicts. The upstream spec file is pure fedora specific. >Wondering out loud: What prevents the "porter" from doing full build and then >packaging only client bits? Yes, he has to install come of the dependencies >for the build to pass but still, it is way easier than actually making server >fully functional. > >Petr, are you going to allocate time for this soonish or should I open a >ticket and forget about it for now? > LS -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
