On 09/07/2012 07:33 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > That is actually the main benefit of the 'ldap.ADdomain' parameter. It > will allow you to simplify configuration and allows easy load > balancing/failover functionality. > We are paying for NetApp support, too so if anyone is going to bug > NetApp about this, I am happy to join you. > > Ondrej > > On 09/07/2012 10:07 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote: >> Yes it would be great if NetApp would do that. The ldap.ADdomain option is >> used to configure the >> NetApp LDAP client from AD SRV DNS records. It would be great (and should be >> easy for NetApp) to >> have an option for ldap.IPAdomain. I don't remember exactly why I did not >> use this for IPA, as far >> as I remember most things worked, but I stumbeled across some issue. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freeipa-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users I will.
Siggi I will also send you a private email to give you access to the wiki. -- Thank you, Dmitri Pal Sr. Engineering Manager for IdM portfolio Red Hat Inc. ------------------------------- Looking to carve out IT costs? www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
_______________________________________________ Freeipa-users mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
