On Fri, September 7, 2012 16:50, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 09/07/2012 07:33 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
>
>> That is actually the main benefit of the 'ldap.ADdomain' parameter. It
>> will allow you to simplify configuration and allows easy load
>> balancing/failover functionality. We
>> are paying for NetApp support, too so if anyone is going to bug NetApp about
>> this, I am happy to
>> join you.
>>
>> Ondrej
>>
>>
>> On 09/07/2012 10:07 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
>>
>>> Yes it would be great if NetApp would do that. The ldap.ADdomain option is
>>> used to configure
>>> the NetApp LDAP client from AD SRV DNS records. It would be great (and
>>> should be easy for
>>> NetApp) to
>>> have an option for ldap.IPAdomain. I don't remember exactly why I did not
>>> use this for IPA, as
>>> far as I remember most things worked, but I stumbeled across some issue.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeipa-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
>>
> I will.
>
>
> Siggi I will also send you a private email to give you access to the wiki.
>
>
I don't think I ever posted the wiki link for my details around NetApp
configuration in a mixed
environment... See below.
http://www.freeipa.org/page/NetApp_integration_in_a_mixed_environment
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
