What is the name of the other maps besides auto.master? You should use _ 
instead of . for any additional maps when you need Solaris autofs 
compatibility. This also need to be reflected in the auto.master.

The Linux automounter does not care about . or _ as long as the naming is 
consistent between the additional maps and auto.master. The default for Linux 
is auto.master with a . and auto_master for Solaris. Hence the auto.master 
mapping in the Solaris dua profile.


Rgds
Siggi

Johan Petersson <johan.peters...@sscspace.com> wrote:

>Got everything except automount to work with Solaris 11 and the more
>secure DUAProfile.
>Verified that i can manually mount with krb5 on Solaris 11, ssh, su and
>console login works (as well as expected with no home directory) and
>automount map works for Red Hat clients.
>I have now tried with another directory for users (/nethome) since when
>trying with /home autofs made local users unavailable. They are
>automounted locally to /home/ from /export/home/  on Solaris for some
>strange reason and autofs then tried finding local users home
>directories on the NFS Server :)
>
>root@solaris2:~# ldapclient list
>NS_LDAP_FILE_VERSION= 2.0
>NS_LDAP_BINDDN= uid=solaris,cn=sysaccounts,cn=etc,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_BINDPASSWD= {XXX}XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>NS_LDAP_SERVERS= server.example.org
>NS_LDAP_SEARCH_BASEDN= dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_AUTH= tls:simple
>NS_LDAP_SEARCH_REF= TRUE
>NS_LDAP_SEARCH_SCOPE= one
>NS_LDAP_SEARCH_TIME= 10
>NS_LDAP_CACHETTL= 6000
>NS_LDAP_PROFILE= solaris_authssl1
>NS_LDAP_CREDENTIAL_LEVEL= proxy
>NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC=
>passwd:cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC=
>group:cn=groups,cn=compat,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC= netgroup:cn=ng,cn=compat,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC=
>ethers:cn=computers,cn=accounts,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC=
>automount:cn=default,cn=automount,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC=
>auto_master:automountMapName=auto.master,cn=default,cn=automount,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC=
>aliases:ou=aliases,ou=test,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC=
>printers:ou=printers,ou=test,dc=example,dc=org
>NS_LDAP_BIND_TIME= 5
>NS_LDAP_OBJECTCLASSMAP= shadow:shadowAccount=posixAccount
>NS_LDAP_OBJECTCLASSMAP= printers:sunPrinter=printerService
>
>root@solaris2:~# sharectl get autofs
>timeout=600
>automount_verbose=true
>automountd_verbose=true
>nobrowse=false
>trace=2
>environment=
>
>From /var/svc/log/system-filesystem-autofs\:default.log:
>
>t4 LOOKUP REQUEST: Wed Dec 26 12:28:43 2012
>t4 name=user02[] map=auto.nethome opts= path=/nethome direct=0
>t4 getmapent_ldap called
>t4 getmapent_ldap: key=[ user02 ]
>t4 ldap_match called
>t4 ldap_match: key =[ user02 ]
>t4 ldap_match: ldapkey =[ user02 ]
>t4 ldap_match: Requesting list for
>(&(objectClass=automount)(automountKey=user02)) in auto.nethome
>t4 ldap_match: __ns_ldap_list FAILED (2)
>t4 ldap_match: no entries found
>t4 ldap_match called
>t4 ldap_match: key =[ \2a ]
>t4 ldap_match: ldapkey =[ \2a ]
>t4 ldap_match: Requesting list for
>(&(objectClass=automount)(automountKey=\2a)) in auto.nethome
>t4 ldap_match: __ns_ldap_list FAILED (2)
>t4 ldap_match: no entries found
>t4 getmapent_ldap: exiting ...
>t4 do_lookup1: action=2 wildcard=FALSE error=2
>t4 LOOKUP REPLY : status=2
>The automount map is called auto.nethome
>key is: * -rw,soft server.example.org:/nethome/&
>
>Is it that Solaris automount dont like asterisk(*) in a automount key?
>
>Regards,
>Johan.
>________________________________________
>From: Sigbjorn Lie [sigbj...@nixtra.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 15:20
>To: Johan Petersson
>Cc: freeipa-users@redhat.com
>Subject: RE: [Freeipa-users] Does Solaris 11 work as client to IPA
>server?
>
>Thanks.
>
>I'm guessing it's taking such a long time because it's looking trough
>the entire LDAP server for
>your automount maps. The automountmap rules in the DUA profile will
>help with that. You'll also
>run into issues if you attempt to have several automount locations
>without having specified which
>one to use with a automountmap rule for auto master.
>
>If you are using NFS4 you should add the _nfsv4idmapdomain dns TXT
>record to your DNS or set
>NFSMAPID_DOMAIN in /etc/default/nfs to the same value as the domain id
>used on your NFS server to
>get rid of the nobody:nobody default mapping and enable mapping between
>the NFS server and the
>client.
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Siggi
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, December 20, 2012 13:40, Johan Petersson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Here is my pam.conf cleaned up a bit.
>>
>>
>> login   auth requisite          pam_authtok_get.so.1 login   auth
>required
>> pam_dhkeys.so.1 login   auth sufficient         pam_krb5.so.1
>try_first_pass login   auth required
>> pam_unix_cred.so.1 login   auth required           pam_unix_auth.so.1
>login   auth required
>> pam_dial_auth.so.1
>>
>> gdm-autologin auth  required    pam_unix_cred.so.1 gdm-autologin auth
> sufficient  pam_allow.so.1
>>
>> other   auth requisite          pam_authtok_get.so.1 other   auth
>required
>> pam_dhkeys.so.1 other   auth required           pam_unix_cred.so.1
>other   auth sufficient
>> pam_krb5.so.1 other   auth required           pam_unix_auth.so.1
>>
>> passwd  auth required           pam_passwd_auth.so.1
>>
>> gdm-autologin account  sufficient  pam_allow.so.1
>>
>> other   account requisite       pam_roles.so.1 other   account
>required
>> pam_unix_account.so.1 other   account required        pam_krb5.so.1
>>
>> other   session required        pam_unix_session.so.1
>>
>> other   password required       pam_dhkeys.so.1 other   password
>requisite
>> pam_authtok_get.so.1
>>
>> other   password requisite      pam_authtok_check.so.1 force_check
>other   password sufficient
>> pam_krb5.so1 other   password required       pam_authtok_store.so.1
>>
>> I am getting one error and it is for autofs.
>>
>>
>> /var/adm/messages:
>> Dec 20 12:56:58 servername automount[1651]: [ID 754625 daemon.error]
>Object not found
>>
>>
>> /var/svc/log/system.filesystem-autofs:default.log:
>> [ Dec 20 12:24:22 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/svc-autofs
>start"). ]
>> automount: /net mounted
>> automount: /nfs4 mounted
>> automount: no unmounts
>> [ Dec 20 12:24:22 Method "start" exited with status 0. ]
>>
>>
>> ldapclient list NS_LDAP_FILE_VERSION= 2.0
>> NS_LDAP_SERVERS= servername
>> NS_LDAP_SEARCH_BASEDN= dc=home
>> NS_LDAP_AUTH= none
>> NS_LDAP_SEARCH_REF= TRUE
>> NS_LDAP_SEARCH_TIME= 15
>> NS_LDAP_PROFILE= default
>> NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC= passwd:cn=users,cn=accounts,dc=home
>> NS_LDAP_SERVICE_SEARCH_DESC= group:cn=groups,cn=compat,dc=home
>> NS_LDAP_BIND_TIME= 5
>> NS_LDAP_OBJECTCLASSMAP= shadow:shadowAccount=posixAccount
>>
>>
>> Thinking it has to do with missing automountmap in default
>DUAProfile.
>> Automount still works though but takes time during login and
>everything is nobody:nobody :)
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Sigbjorn Lie [sigbj...@nixtra.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:13
>> To: Johan Petersson
>> Cc: freeipa-users@redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Does Solaris 11 work as client to IPA
>server?
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> This is interesting. When I tested Solaris 11 ssh worked, and su -
>testuser worked. However
>> console login did not work giving some PAM errors.
>>
>> Could you please share your entire pam.conf file?
>>
>>
>> Is this Solaris 11 or Solaris 11.1?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Siggi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, December 20, 2012 09:40, Johan Petersson wrote:
>>
>>> I have now managed to use a Solaris 11 system as a client to IPA
>Server.
>>> su - testuser works ssh works and console login works. I get a delay
>before getting the prompt
>>> through ssh though and maybe from console too, probably something
>about autofs Going to see if
>>> i can increase loginformation (Solaris newbie). To get it to work i
>mainly followed Sigbjorn
>>> Lie's
>>> instructions for Solaris 10 in earlier posts here. I also used the
>/etc/pam.conf configuration
>>> example from the Solaris 10 client guide on Free IPA. I stuck with
>the default DUAProfile for
>>> now and use a NFS4 Kerberos share for home directories with autofs.
>Going to try the other
>>> DUAProfile
>>> too from Bug 815515 and hopefully i can get everything working.
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com
>[freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com] on behalf of Dmitri
>>> Pal
>>> [d...@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 17:50
>>> To: freeipa-users@redhat.com
>>> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] Does Solaris 11 work as client to IPA
>server?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/18/2012 04:06 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, December 18, 2012 08:28, Johan Petersson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We are implementing IPA Server and are gong to need to be able to
>authenticate properly
>>>>> with a number of Solaris 11 servers. I have browsed the archives
>and found a few threads
>>>>> mentioning some problems with Solaris 11 and IPA Server. Does
>anyone know if the issue have
>>>>> been solved?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I don't think there is any problems with Solaris 11 except of
>nobody has yet sat down and
>>>> figured out how to configure it as an IPA client yet.
>>>>
>>>> I had a got at it a while ago (some of the posts you've probably
>found), and found that there
>>>>  was enough differences in the LDAP/Kerberos client between Solaris
>10 and Solaris 11 for
>>>> making it work with the setup guide I've created for Solaris 10.
>And there was a need for
>>>> further investigation for finding out how to configure Solaris 11
>as an IPA client.
>>>>
>>>> I've not looked into this further as we do not use Solaris 11 yet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if anyone else has had time to sit down and have a
>crack at this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> And we would like to hear about this effort.
>>> If it produces instructions we would like to put them on the wiki.
>>> If it produces bugs we would investigate them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Siggi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freeipa-users mailing list
>>>> Freeipa-users@redhat.com
>>>>
>>
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thank you,
>>> Dmitri Pal
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sr. Engineering Manager for IdM portfolio
>>> Red Hat Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------
>>> Looking to carve out IT costs?
>>> www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freeipa-users mailing list
>>> Freeipa-users@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freeipa-users mailing list
>>> Freeipa-users@redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

Reply via email to