On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 18:54 +0000, Coy Hile wrote:
> Quoting Simo Sorce <s...@redhat.com>:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> I guess that makes sense. Is it possible to add a user that simply
> >> doesn't have the posix attributes defined? In the particular case of
> >> */admin, I would expect that user to login to the ipa ui or to be
> >> kinit'd to prior to running ipa administrative commands, but I should
> >> hope that it should never login directly.
> >> Does that question make more sense?
> > It does, but we do not have such a feature, sorry.
> > Simo.
> Could one hypothetically remove the posix attributes (via some scripted
> process that validates that what it's doing is inline with organizational
> norms/goals) without breaking freeIPA, or are the posix attributes MUST in
> the IPA object classes? I'm sorry for so many endless questions, but having
> finally got my personal setup/lab using something other than Active Directory,
> I'm looking to migrate to something that is easier to manage, so I'm trying to
> draw comparisons between what I had been used to in previous vanilla krb/ldap
Removing attributes will probably not work well, but let me ask:
Do you require different passwords for these principals ?
Or do you merely want to have the alternative names but would be ok if
the credentials were identical ?
Because you could (manually for now) add aliases so that hile@
hile/admin@ hile/foo@ are the same thing, where hile@ is the canonical
name but you can use aliases too (just make sure not to request
canonicalization at kinit time.
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project