On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 08:42 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> Hey Levi,
>
> Thanks for noticing this. I'm guessing that the implementation changed
> awhile back and I forgot to change the comments.
>
> I need to look at the code again the refresh my memory on how best to
> implement this. Looking at ipmiconsole (the tool, not the lib) it seems
> neither ipmiconsole_ctx_destroy() or ipmiconsole_engine_teardown()
> block. I actually spin waiting for ipmiconsole_ctx_destroy() to return
> a non-zero value back to me.
>
> I'll modify the comments for now, and add blocking equivalents into my
> TODO.
>
> Is this something that's needed soon on your end?
>
> Al
Actually, although I thought ipmiconsole_engine_teardown() would
disconnect all the sessions, calling ipmi_ctx_destroy() in a spin-loop
after tearing the engine down never seems to indicate success. Oh well,
I'll figure something out.
--Levi
_______________________________________________
Freeipmi-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
