On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 10:23 -0600, Levi Pearson wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 08:42 -0700, Al Chu wrote: > > Hey Levi, > > > > Thanks for noticing this. I'm guessing that the implementation changed > > awhile back and I forgot to change the comments. > > > > I need to look at the code again the refresh my memory on how best to > > implement this. Looking at ipmiconsole (the tool, not the lib) it seems > > neither ipmiconsole_ctx_destroy() or ipmiconsole_engine_teardown() > > block. I actually spin waiting for ipmiconsole_ctx_destroy() to return > > a non-zero value back to me. > > > > I'll modify the comments for now, and add blocking equivalents into my > > TODO. > > > > Is this something that's needed soon on your end? > > > > Al > > > Actually, although I thought ipmiconsole_engine_teardown() would > disconnect all the sessions, calling ipmi_ctx_destroy() in a spin-loop > after tearing the engine down never seems to indicate success. Oh well, > I'll figure something out. > > --Levi
Now this is a bug. I will look into this one. Al -- Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 925-422-5311 Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
