On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 10:23 -0600, Levi Pearson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 08:42 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> > Hey Levi,
> > Thanks for noticing this. I'm guessing that the implementation changed
> > awhile back and I forgot to change the comments.
> > I need to look at the code again the refresh my memory on how best to
> > implement this. Looking at ipmiconsole (the tool, not the lib) it seems
> > neither ipmiconsole_ctx_destroy() or ipmiconsole_engine_teardown()
> > block. I actually spin waiting for ipmiconsole_ctx_destroy() to return
> > a non-zero value back to me.
> > I'll modify the comments for now, and add blocking equivalents into my
> > TODO.
> > Is this something that's needed soon on your end?
> > Al
> Actually, although I thought ipmiconsole_engine_teardown() would
> disconnect all the sessions, calling ipmi_ctx_destroy() in a spin-loop
> after tearing the engine down never seems to indicate success. Oh well,
> I'll figure something out.
Now this is a bug. I will look into this one.
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Freeipmi-devel mailing list