Dan Polansky wrote: > what makes you think you need to include the source of SimplyHTML in > the source distribution of FreeMind? I think, point (paragraph?) 3 of GPL v2? I'm not sure it has to be included (only if FreeMind uses a modified version of SimplyHTML) but at least it should be provided on request.
What are additional advantages/disadvantages of providing the SimplyHTML source anyway? In my opinion, it surely makes the code easier to compile (no need to hunt for The Right Approved Version of SimplyHTML), and makes bug reports more consistent (ie. you don't need to say which version of SimplyHTML you used in order to compile FreeMind when reporting a bug), but also makes the sources larger - and that's probably all. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Freemind-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemind-developer
